The Decision Value of Price and Macro Information
Overview
This study asks whether macroeconomic information adds portfolio decision value beyond information already contained in market prices. The comparison is built around a matched multi-asset forecasting, ranking, and Top-4 allocation process rather than comparing unrelated strategies.
Historical-vintage FRED-MD data are used to evaluate macro information under a documented information clock. The paper then measures the incremental contribution of Macro+Price relative to a price-only process, with benchmark-relative evidence and robustness checks designed to separate predictive inputs from portfolio mechanics.
Research Question
Key Findings
Selected Evidence
The central empirical distinction is between value already present in price-based decisions and the incremental value obtained after macro information is added to the same decision architecture.
Primary one-month-ahead results relative to the same-universe EW11 benchmark.
| Strategy | Active return | TE | IR | Sharpe | Max drawdown | Turnover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price-only ML | 5.0% | 7.1% | 0.71 | 0.821 | −17.7% | 3.06 |
| 12M momentum | 2.4% | 9.1% | 0.27 | 0.750 | −18.4% | 2.18 |
| 12-1M momentum | 3.1% | 8.3% | 0.37 | 0.750 | −19.1% | 2.22 |
| 6M momentum | 1.7% | 7.9% | 0.21 | 0.676 | −22.5% | 2.81 |
| Macro+Price ML | 5.4% | 7.9% | 0.69 | 0.798 | −25.6% | 3.07 |
| Macro-only ML | 2.6% | 7.7% | 0.34 | 0.680 | −27.1% | 2.71 |
Selected figures summarize price-based active value, incremental macro evidence, and timing robustness.
Price Signals Generate Benchmark-Relative Active Value
Relative to the same-universe EW11 benchmark, the price-only ML portfolio records an information ratio of 0.71 and 5.0% annualized active return. The exhibit also places that result beside standard momentum variants under the same benchmark-relative lens.
Open full-size figure ↗The Incremental Macro Contribution Is Not Robustly Positive
The matched Macro+Price versus Price-only comparisons do not show a stable positive Sharpe increment across the main robustness checks. The exhibit focuses on the incremental contribution of macro information rather than on standalone portfolio returns.
Open full-size figure ↗Timing Changes Portfolio Choices Without Reversing the Result
Under the conservative prior-month macro information clock, the Macro+Price minus Price-only Sharpe difference is −0.192 with a 95% moving-block bootstrap interval of [−0.659, 0.175]. The Macro+Price Top-4 selection changes in 52.7% of months relative to the primary timing design.
Open full-size figure ↗Research Design
The public replication package documents the paper-level evidence for the matched price and macro comparison. The primary analysis covers monthly out-of-sample allocation decisions from March 2017 through June 2026 across an 11-ETF U.S.-listed multi-asset universe.
Information Timing
A monthly FRED-MD vintage label is not treated as proof of exact within-month availability. The paper therefore includes a prespecified conservative timing check using the prior monthly vintage and an older macro reference month, while keeping the market-price information clock separate. The incremental-macro conclusion is unchanged under that convention.
Reproducibility
Public code, the tagged replication release, and the archived Zenodo record are presented here as reproducibility artifacts, separate from the primary paper-access actions at the top of the page.
Replication Repository
Paper-level code, derived evidence, and reproducibility checks.
Open GitHub ↗Zenodo DOI
Persistent archive for the public replication release.
10.5281/zenodo.22069742 ↗